This order records the dismissal of the petition as it was withdrawn. No substantive legal principle is discussed or decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1662-2016 (O & M) Date of decision: 13.01.2017
Manjit Singh
…. Petitioner
V/s
Vikas Gupta and anr.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vikas Sonak, Advocate, for Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P.S. Chauhan, Addl.A.G., Haryana.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the writ court has been complied with. He may be allowed to withdraw this petition.
Prayer is accepted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
January 13, 2017 sukhpreet
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.01.17 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Manjit Singh
Vikas Gupta
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
