Jatinder Kumar v. Sarvesh Kaushal & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1205-2016 (O & M) Date of decision: 13.01.2017
Jatinder Kumar
…. Petitioner
V/s
Sarvesh Kaushal and ors.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel submits that the claim of the petitioner for employment being oustee in respect the land required for the purpose of Ranjit Sagar Dam, has been considered. It has been found that he is not entitled to employment in terms of the Policy. A speaking order, Annexure R-4, has been passed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to impugn the speaking order, Annexure R-4, if so advised.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
January 13, 2017 sukhpreet
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.01.17 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jatinder Kumar
Sarvesh Kaushal
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court