The High Court of Punjab and Haryana permitted the petitioner to withdraw a revision petition after it was submitted that the sentence had already been undergone and the petitioner did not wish to pursue the matter.
Permission to withdraw the revision petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-1245-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.02.2014
Amrik Singh
...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Varun Sharma, AAG, Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already undergone the awarded sentence, as such, he does not want to pursue this revision. He has sought permission to withdraw the same.
Prayer allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
13.02.2014
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
‘Satyawan’
Satyawan 2014.02.17 14:03 "I attested to the accuracy and integrity of this document" High Court Chandigarh
Amrik Singh
State of Punjab
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
