Petition was dismissed as withdrawn allowing the petitioners to raise contentions before the trial court. No substantive legal issues disposed. Judgment recorded as an oral order.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to raise contentions before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3634-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 28, 2014
Ramanpreet Singh and another
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Ms.Puja Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Mikhail Kad, AAG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for
withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioners to raise all the contentions taken in this petition before learned trial
Court at an appropriate stage.
The prayer has not been opposed.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
October 28, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) meenu Judge
MEENU 2014.10.29 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Ramanpreet Singh and another
State of Punjab
Naresh Kumar Sanghi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
