COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
petition withdrawn; trial court directed to expedite proceedings due to delay and recovery.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-23126 of 2014 Date of Decision: October 28, 2014
Melo Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Parminder Singh Sekhon, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab.,
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for
withdrawal of the present petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the fact that the petitioner is behind the
bars for the last more than one year and further taking into consideration the recovery effected from the petitioner, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial.
October 28, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2014.10.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Melo Kaur
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
