Omnibus dismissal of a petition where the petitioner's counsel declined to press the plea since the petitioner was not required as an accused by the investigating agency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-33953 of 2014 Date of Decision: October 28, 2014
Shamsher Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Hardeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Shilesh Gutpa, Addl.AG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI
Naresh Kumar, Police Station, Civil Lines, Patiala, submits that the petitioner is not required as an accused by the Investigating Agency in the present case.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the
petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.
Disposed of accordingly.
October 28, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2014.10.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
SHAMSHER SINGH
STATE OF PUNJAB
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
