Rakesh Kumar v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-34424-2011 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-34424-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 27, 2014
Rakesh Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
Ravi Dutt
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the matter has amicably been resolved between the private parties, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. He prays for withdrawal of the present petition.
Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to
the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
October 27, 2014 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
PRASHANT KAPOOR 2014.10.28 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Rakesh Kumar
Ravi Dutt
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court