Amit Yadav v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dismissed a bail petition. The petitioner, Amit Yadav (also known as Karan), sought anticipatory bail for offences under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Foreigners Act related to running a brothel. The court held that the petitioner's role was disclosed by co-accused and custodial interrogation was necessary, finding no grounds for bail.
What did the court decide?
Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed; no ground for grant of anticipatory bail made out.