Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition; respondent had no objection. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12514-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 17, 2014
Dr.Bhushan Garg
.....Petitioner
Versus
Vishal Sharma
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.H.S.Mavi, Advocate for Mr.Daldeep Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr.Tapan Yadav, Advocate for the respondent.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
the instructions to withdraw the present petition.
Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection
to the above prayer.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
October 17, 2014
meenu
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi) Judge
MEENU 2014.10.17 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Dr.Bhushan Garg
Vishal Sharma
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
