Petitioner withdrew Civil Revision No.8766 of 2014. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. Rent Controller to consider rate of rent while framing issues.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise plea on rate of rent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.8766 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 23, 2014.
Abdul Rashid
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
Dinesh Kumar
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Mohd. Salim, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise
the plea and press for framing of issue on the point of rate of rent.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
As the question of rate of rent is in issue, the Rent Controller
while framing issues, will look into this aspect and proceed in accordance
with law.
December 23, 2014.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Sachin M.
SACHIN MEHTA 2014.12.23 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Abdul Rashid
Dinesh Kumar
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
