Dismissed

Ajit Singh v. Gurdarshan Singh

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Dec 2014CR/6817/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil revision regarding a tenancy dispute where the petitioner-tenant sought to withdraw the petition with permission to vacate premises. The court allowed the withdrawal, granting time until July 31, 2015, subject to rent payment conditions and a filed affidavit.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; petitioner allowed time until 31st July 2015 to vacate premises upon payment of due rent and subsequent monthly advance rent.

Ajit Singh Vs Gurdarshan Singh — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2014)

¶1

CR-6817-2014

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Civil Revision No.6817 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 18, 2014.

¶5

Ajit Singh

¶6

......PETITIONER(s).

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

Gurdarshan Singh

¶9

....RESPONDENT(s).

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr. Randeep Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

¶12

¶13

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with prayer that petitioner be allowed reasonable time for vacating and handing over the possession of the demised premises by the revision petitioner to the respondent-landlord.

¶15

Mr. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent and agrees with the proposal as put forth by learned counsel for the petitioner to the extent that the respondent has no objection in allowing of time upto 31^st July, 2015 to the revision petitioner to vacate the demised premises.

¶16

In view of request made by learned counsel for the petitioner,

¶17

SACHIN MEHTA 2014.12.19 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CR-6817-2014

¶19

-2-

¶20

this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The revision petitioner is allowed period upto 31^st July, 2015 to vacate the demised premises, subject to the following terms:-

¶21

(i) The petitioner-tenant will pay/deposit the entire due rent upto 31^st December 2014 within two weeks.

¶22

(ii) He will keep on paying/depositing the advance rent/mesne profits of subsequent months upto 31.07.2015 on or before 7^th day of each month.

¶23

(iii) He will file affidavit before the Rent Controller within three

¶24

weeks giving details of entire payment of rent/mesne profits.

¶25

In case of default of any of the above terms, the respondentlandlord will be entitled to execute the order of ejectment forthwith.

¶26

December 18, 2014.

¶27

( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE

¶28

Sachin M.

¶29

SACHIN MEHTA 2014.12.19 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Ajit Singh v. Gurdarshan Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Singh v. Gurdarshan Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anupam Behal Vs Janak Raj Sethi

Punjab Agro Foods Grain Corp Ltd. and Anr. Vs Vijay Kumar Gupta

(O&M) Sukhdev Munni Vs Sant Heera Dass Educational Society

Sanjiv Kumar Vs Gurdarshan Singh

Sukhwinder Kaur and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Sudesh Sharma Vs Shri Jainendra Gurukul Panchkula