Petitioner seeking writ direction for land plot allotment under oustees policy due to land acquisition. Court dispensed with notice and directed HUDA to decide pending representation within three months.
Direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide representation dated 24.6.2012 within three months by passing speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 8210 of 2013
DATE OF DECISION : 22.04.2013
Chatar Singh
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Randhir Singh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
The petitioner has filed the instant petition for issuing direction to the respondents to allot him plot under the oustees category.
It is the case of the petitioner that vide notification dated 6.5.1996, his land measuring 45 kanals 2 marlas, situated in village Unchagaon, Tehsil Ballabgarh, District Faridabad was acquired for Institutional, Residential and Commercial Sector 62, Faridabad. It is the further case of the petitioner that in spite of the requests made by him, the respondents did not consider his claim for allotment of plot under the oustees policy of the State Government. In this regard, representation dated 24.6.2012, copy of which is available on record as Annexure P-11, was submitted by the petitioner to the Administrator, HUDA, Faridabad
CWP No. 8210 of 2013
-2-
(respondent No. 3 herein), but till date the same has not been considered and decided.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, without issuing notice of motion as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 24.6.2012 in accordance with law by passing a speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE April 22, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to direction for allotment of plot under oustees category.
Whether Land Acquisition compensation claim requires expedited consideration by HUDA.
Chatar Singh
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
