This writ petition, filed seeking extension of construction time, was dismissed upon the petitioner's withdrawal of the petition after the respondents acceded to the extension fee.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to refile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.6367 of 2013 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CWP No.6367 of 2013 Date of decision: 22.4.2013
Jugal Kishore Gautam
... Petitioner
vs
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH.
Present: Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents are
acceding to the prayer of the petitioner for extension of time for
construction, after accepting the extension fee and, therefore, he wants to withdraw this petition, with liberty to pursue the same.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
22.4.2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) pk JUDGE
Jugal Kishore Gautam
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
