Sunil Kumar v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRWP No.986 of 2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Writ Petition No.986 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: May 24, 2013.
Sunil Kumar
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Keerat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for appointment of Warrant Officer to visit the spot and to set at liberty the alleged detenues mentioned in para no.4 of the petition.
Warrant Officer was appointed in this case vide order dated 03.05.2013 of this Court. Report has been received to the effect that alleged detenues mentioned in para no.4 of the petition were working at the brickkiln with their free consent and however, on his asking they replied that they wanted to leave the premises of brick-kiln and that they have already left the premises in his presence.
CRWP No.986 of 2013
2
Reply has also been filed on behalf of the State that the workers mentioned in the writ petition have already been got released by warrant officer.
Hence, in view of these facts, no further order is required to be passed in this petition.
Disposed of accordingly.
May 24, 2013. ‘om’
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE
Sunil Kumar
State of Punjab
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court