A bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed in a criminal matter was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-38899 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: January 15, 2013
Prithvi Pal
.....Petitioner
v.
The State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Vikas P.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.73906 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-38899 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.69, dated 18.2.2011, under Sections 148, 149, 302, 342, 323, 382, 201, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Mohindergarh.
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
15.1.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the petition seeking bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. or to dismiss it as withdrawn.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prithvi Pal
The State of Haryana
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
