The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.18 registered under various IPC offences. The court allowed the application subject to exceptions in one related case and dismissed the main petition as withdrawn on January 15, 2013.
The petition for quashing of FIR No.18 was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-34872 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: January 15, 2013
Ashok Kumar
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Vikas Gupta, Advocate for Mr.Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.66489 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-34872 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.18, dated 30.1.2009, under Sections 279, 338, 427, 304-A IPC, registered at Police Station Majitha, Amritsar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
15.1.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss the petition for quashing of FIR No.18 under Sections 279, 338, 427 and 304-A IPC.
Whether to withdraw the petition for quashing on grounds of withdrawal by the petitioner?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Kumar
State of Punjab
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
