Petitioner's bail petition in a criminal matter was disposed of because it was not pressed by counsel. The court ordered that a one-week clear notice be given prior to the petitioner's arrest if required by the investigating agency.
Petitioner to be given one week clear notice before arrest if Investigating Agency requires presence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-33972 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03rd December, 2013
Prikshit Kumar Pahwa
.. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.S.S.Narula, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Harjinder Singh, Police Station, Sohana, District SAS Nagar, Mohali, submits that after thorough investigation, the untraced report has been prepared in this case and the same is likely to be presented before the learned Area Judicial Magistrate in the near future.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.
Disposed of being not pressed.
In case the Investigating Agency requires the presence of the petitioner then the petitioner shall be given one week clear notice before his arrest.
December 03, 2013 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) Seema Judge
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi)
Prikshit Kumar Pahwa
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
