Petitioners perceived the relationship of the petitioners to be accepted by private respondents. Petition filed in Criminal Revision Miscellaneous was disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M-31159 of 2012 Date of decision: 19.03.2013
Goldy Rani & Anr.
..Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and Ors.
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
Present: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. G.S. Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 & 5.
M.M.S. BEDI, J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the relationship
of the petitioners has been accepted by the private-respondents.
Disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
19.03.2013 Poonam (II)
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE
Goldy Rani & Anr.
State of Punjab and Ors.
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
