Petitioner sought to make an interim bail order absolute after joining investigation. The court accepted compliance and made the order absolute.
The interim order dated 23.08.2013 confirming interim bail and directing joining of investigation is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-27335 of 2013 Date of decision: 22.11.2013.
Nita Ram
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajat Mor, DAG, Haryana for the respondent – State.
Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the complainant.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 23.08.2013, the petitioner has joined investigation and has been released on interim bail. The factum of joining investigation has been affirmed by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Lal Chand.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel, the interim order dated 23.08.2013 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
22.11.2013
neetu
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Rani Neetu 2013.11.25 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim order granting bail to the petitioner should be made absolute after complying with the directed investigation.
Nita Ram
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
