Rakesh Bansal and Anr. v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Headnote only text. The document contains fragmentary header information indicating a Criminal Appeal before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, but lacks substantive judgment body, orders, or reasoning necessary to determine disposition, legal principles, or facts. No substantive extraction possible from the provided text.
What the court decided
6
INTHEHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB ANDHARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Crl AppealNoe2838aSBof2010
DATE OF DECISION 2022013
RakeshBansaland another I e Appellants
Versus Stateof Haryanaand others eeeeeeespondents 1 l BEFOREe HONBLE MRS JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY 0 C I Presentle Mr SunilTandonAdvocate C5 for the appellants I Mr RajatMor DAG Haryana Z Mr N Shekhawat Advocate for the private C 11k I a5 DAYACHAUDHARY J For orderssee Ctl AppealN Se203SB of 2011 titledas mI Z DineshKumar and another Vs State of Haryan a nd others decidedon CJm even date 1DAYACHAUDHARYI POOJa JUDGE
RASHMI 2014.12.23 10: 26 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh
JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rakesh Bansal and another
- respondent
State of Haryana and others
Coram
Daya Chaudhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRA-S/2838/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court