In a bail petition, the High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who faced murder and conspiracy charges, noting the lack of specific injury attribution and low prosecution witness count.
Petitioner ordered to be released on bail pending trial, subject to furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Criminal Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Criminal Misc.No.M-24311 of 2013
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-24311 of 2013 Date of Decision: 11th December, 2013
Sandeep Bhatia
.. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Navpreet S.Kohli, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Deepak Girothra, AAG, Haryana.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Sharma Seema 2013.12.11 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Criminal Misc.No.M-24311 of 2013
{2}
December 11, 2013
seema
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi)
Judge
Sharma Seema 2013.12.11 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious charges of murder and conspiracy.
Whether the lack of specific attribution of injuries to the petitioner and insufficient witness examination warrants bail.
Sandeep Bhatia
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
