Petitioner withdrew criminal miscellaneous petition before Trial Court on instructions from State after final arguments were fixed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-21775-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 6, 2013
Amrik Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Parminder Singh Sekhon, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the State on instructions from SI Anwar Ali of Police Station, Sadar, Dhuri, District Sangrur, submits that after completion of the evidence of both the sides, the case is fixed for 9.12.2013, for final arguments before the learned Trial Court.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.
Disposed of accordingly.
December 6, 2013 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Kapoor Prashant 2013.12.06 16:46 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Amrik Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
