Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court permitted the withdrawal without prejudice.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition with better material.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRL. MISC. No.M-13882 OF 2013 DATE OF DECISION : 20th MAY, 2013
Suresh Kumar @ Bittu
…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & others
…. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. L. S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to file fresh one with better material.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
20th May, 2013 (L. N. MITTAL) ‘raj’ JUDGE
Suresh Kumar @ Bittu
State of Punjab & others
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
