Petitioner challenged bail in Criminal Misc. 10028 of 2013. The court disposed of the petition as the petitioner was acquitted by the trial court, rendering the application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc. No.M-10028 of 2013 Date of Decision: 17.05.2013
Surinder Kumar
..... PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Punjab
..... RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L N MITTAL
PRESENT: - Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
L N MITTAL, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel on instructions from SI Joginder Singh stated that the instant petition for bail has been rendered infructuous because the petitioneraccused has since been acquitted by the trial Court.
Accordingly, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of has having been rendered infructuous.
( L N MITTAL )
May 17, 2013 Judge jt
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surinder Kumar
State of Punjab
L N MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
