The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the grounds that the matter had been settled with the private respondents (parents, uncle, and grandfather of the petitioner). No substantive legal proposition is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-12223 of 2012 Date of Decision : May 17, 2013
Jaswinder Kaur and another
.... Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and others .... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. P. K. S. Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Mikhail Kad, AAG, Punjab for respondents no. 1 to 3.
Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for respondents no. 4 to 7.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from the petitioners, said to be present in person in the Court, seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition stating that the matter has been settled with private respondents no. 4 to 7, who are parents, uncle and grandfather of petitioner no. 1.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
May 17, 2013
monika
Jaswinder Kaur and another
State of Punjab
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
