Petition for criminal misc. relief was disposed of as infructuous because the trial court had dismissed the underlying criminal complaint as withdrawn.
None; petition disposed of of being rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-11974 of 2012 Date of Decision : May 17, 2013
Mahavir Prasad and another
.... Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and another .... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. Parvez Chugh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Mikhail Kad, AAG, Punjab for respondent no. 1.
Mr. K. B. S. Mann, Advocate for respondent no. 2.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
Counsel for petitioners and respondent no. 2 stated that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous because the impugned criminal complaint has since been dismissed as withdrawn by the trial court.
Accordingly, as prayed for by counsel for the petitioners, the
instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
May 17, 2013 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE
Mahavir Prasad and another
State of Punjab and another
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
