Disposed

Pooja and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Apr 2013CRM-M/13236/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking protection of life and liberty, the court disposed of the matter without deciding merits, directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ropar, to take appropriate action on a prior representation filed by the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ropar to take appropriate action on the representation filed by the petitioners.

Pooja and Anr. Vs State of Pun… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

¶2

CRM-M No. 13236 of 2013(O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M No. 13236 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: 26.04.2013

¶5

Pooja and another

¶6

........Petitioners

¶7

versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

......... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari

¶11

Present: Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate

¶12

for the petitioners.

¶13

¶14

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶15

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶16

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶17

Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral):

¶18

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is for issuance of a direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No. 4 and 5.

¶19

The petitioners have got married against the wishes of their parents. They are stated to be major. Petitioner No.1 in support of her age proof, has placed on record extract of her High School Examination Certificate (Annexure P-1) which shows her date of birth as 17.02.1991. Petitioner No.2 in support of his age proof has also placed on record extract of his voter identity card (Annexure P-2) which shows his age as on 1.1.2007 to be 21 years. They have already moved a representation before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ropar for protecting their life and

¶20

liberty. Copy of the representation is annexed as Annexure P-4.

¶21

CRM-M No. 13236 of 2013(O&M)

¶22

¶23

Without adverting to the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ropar to take an appropriate action on the said representation.

¶24

Since the main case has been decided, the pending Criminal Misc. Application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶25

A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the petitioners on payment of usual charges.

¶26

(AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE

¶27

April 26, 2013 sunita

Pooja and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pooja and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kiranjit Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Kashmir Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Suman Bala and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Om Parkash Vs State of Haryana

Manisha Kumari and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Kulwinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.