The High Court at Chandigarh allowed an application for bail. The court granted bail to the petitioner, Kiranjit Kaur, noting that her husband, the main accused, had already been granted bail in a related case.
Bail allowed to the petitioner to be satisfied by the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-11256 of 2013 Decided on: 25.04.2013
Kiranjit Kaur
.... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present: Mr. P.S.Mirpur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. J.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the complainant.
Ajay Tewari, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the main accused – Rajinder Singh has been granted bail by order of even date in CRM No.M-12544 of 2013.
Learned State counsel has accepted this fact.
In these circumstances, I find no reason to deny the benefit of
bail to the petitioner. The application is allowed.
Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
( AJAY TEWARI )
April 25, 2013 sonia
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail given that the main accused has already been granted bail.
KIRANJIT KAUR
STATE OF PUNJAB
AJAY TEWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
