Dismissed
Seema v. State of U.T. Chandigarh
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/11388/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11388 of 2013 (O&M). Date of decision: May 23, 2013.
Seema
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of UT Chandigarh
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr.G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Sukant Gupta, Addl. P.P., UT. Chandigarh.
M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL).
Petitioner is alleged to have connived with her coaccused Naresh and forced the complainant to have physical relations with other persons.
At this stage, counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage, with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again after examination of the victim in the Court.
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE
May 23, 2013. rka
Seema
State of UT Chandigarh
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court