Disposed
Shanti Devi v. Baldev Kumar
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/6502/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R.No.6502 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:21.08.2013
Shanti Devi
....Petitioner
Versus
Baldev Kumar
....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. N.S.Thind, Advocate for the respondent.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
In view of the order passed in Civil Revision No.6596 of 2011, wherein, the tenant-respondent has sought time to vacate the demised premises, counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition.
Ordered accordingly.
August 21, 2013 savita
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2013.08.22 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Shanti Devi
Baldev Kumar
RAKESH KUMAR GARG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court