The contempt petition was declared infructuous and disposed of as a speaking order pursuant to this Court's directions was passed in compliance of the directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.3652 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 25th March, 2013
Raj Kumar and others
� Petitioners
Versus
Dr. Kamal Kumar
� Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present: Mr. Madhav Pokhral, Advocate for Dr. M.L. Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.C. Berry, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that in compliance of the directions issued by this Court, a speaking order has been passed, and thus, the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous and deserves to be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
March 25, 2013 rps
Raj Kumar and others
Dr. Kamal Kumar
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
