Kara v. C R Jyotriwal & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the petition as the impugned order of the court had been complied with.
What did the court decide?
N/A
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 3433 of 2012 (O&M)
Kara
.. Petitioner
versus
C. R. Jyotriwal and another .. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Anil Mehta, Advocate for Mr. J. S. Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he does not wish to press the present petition as the order passed by this court has been complied with.
Ordered accordingly.
19.3.2013 vs
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kara
- respondent
C. R. Jyotriwal
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- COCP/3433/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court