The court noted that the order passed by this court had been complied with, and the petitioner did not wish to press the petition; accordingly, the matter was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 2941 of 2012 (O&M)
Ashok Kumar
.. Petitioner
versus
K. B. S. Sidhu and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. B. S. Jaswal, Advocate for Mr. M. K. Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. APS Mann, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. I. S. Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent no. 5.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as the order passed by this court has been complied with, he does not wish to press the present petition.
Ordered accordingly.
13.3.2013 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge
Ashok Kumar
K. B. S. Sidhu
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
