The court noted that the order passed in the present proceeding had been complied with by the petitioners, leading to the withdrawal or dismissal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 1486 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.3.2013
Vidya Sagar and others
.. Petitioners
v.
Dr. G. Vajralingam and another
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. A. P. S. Mann, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he does not wish to press the present petition as the order passed by this court has been complied with.
Ordered accordingly.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
13.3.2013 mk
Vidya Sagar and others
Dr. G. Vajralingam and another
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
