Petitioner requested to withdraw the writ petition and get back the court fee deposited. Respondents had no objection. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and ordered return of deposit.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; petitioner entitled to refund of deposited amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
::1::
CWP No.2455 of 2012 (O & M)
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.2455 of 2012 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 07, 2012
Des Raj Kataria
....Petitioner
Versus
ICICI Bank Ltd. and others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. H.S. Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rohit Suri, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Nitin Grover, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press this petition and he may be allowed to withdraw the same. He prays that the amount deposited by the petitioner with the Registrar (General) of this Court be returned to the petitioner.
the afore-mentioned prayer being granted.
CWP No.2455 of 2012 (O & M) ::2::
withdrawn as prayed for. However, the Registrar (General) shall return the amount which has been deposited by the petitioner during the pendency of the writ petition.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
September 07, 2012 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) Sukhpreet JUDGE
Des Raj Kataria
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
