Single judge order declaring writ petition on service regularization infructuous following respondent's claim of regularization via 2004 order.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.2430 of 2003 Date of Decision:- 10.07.2012
Kalam Singh and others
....Petitioner(s)
vs.
The State of Haryana and others
....Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present:None for the petitioners.
Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.D.A.G, Haryana.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral)
Petitioners had approached this Court with a prayer for regularization of their services.
Reply which has been filed on behalf of the respondents indicate that the services of the petitioners have been regularized vide order dated 8.7.2004 (Annexure R-1) w.e.f. 30.9.2003.
Counsel for the State, on the basis of the written statement, submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
July 10, 2012 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE
Kalam Singh
The State of Haryana
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
