Regression to a prior order disposing of a related writ petition; no substantive analysis or decision provided in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.20982 of 2011 Date of decision:- 27.08.2012
E.H.C. Ramphal and others
.....Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present: Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral)
For orders, see CWP No.20981 of 2011 titled as “Ct. Surjit
Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others” .
(Augustine George Masih) Judge
27.08.2012 sonika
E.H.C. Ramphal and others
State of Haryana and others
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
