In this writ petition regarding service benefits, the single judge held that since the Full Bench judgment relied upon by the petitioner was set aside by the Supreme Court, the writ petition stands dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed based on the superseding Supreme Court judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.12698 of 1999(O&M) Date of Decision : 24.08.2012
Dayal Dass
... Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana & others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present : Mr. Subhash Ahuja , Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.
Counsel for the petitioner very fairly states that the Full Bench judgment on the basis of which petitioner has claimed the benefit in the writ petition has been set aside by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its decision titled as State of Haryana vs. Haryana
Veterinary and A.H.T.S. Association and another, 2000(4) RSJ, 167.
In view of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana's case(supra), the writ petition stands dismissed.
24.08. 2012 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) sonia JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition claiming benefit based on a superseded Full Bench judgment must be dismissed after the Supreme Court set aside that judgment?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana vs. Haryana Veterinary and A.H.T.S. Association and anotherReferred¶13
State of Haryana vs. Haryana Veterinary and A.H.T.S. Association and another, 2000(4) RSJ, 167.
Dayal Dass
State of Haryana
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
