The petitioner moved this Court's Civil Writ Jurisdiction petition from 2010. Counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted the submission and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.17686 of 2010
Date of decision : 14.5.2012
Sonu Shukla
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr.S.K.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant
petition has been rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as such.
Ordered accordingly.
14.5.2012 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
dss
Sonu Shukla
State of Punjab
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
