This is a thin order where the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petitioner's petition for anticipatory bail (Crl.M.No.M-3904 of 2012) as it was withdrawn at the hearing. The earlier interim order is vacated.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order dated 10.2.2012 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-3904 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: May 11, 2012
Shakuntla Goyal
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms.Simsi Dhir Malhotra, DAG, Punjab.
Mr.Vipul Bishnoi, Advocate for the complainant.
.......
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.27, dated 23.12.2011,
under Sections 406, 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Women, District Ludhiana.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order dated 10.2.2012 is vacated.
11.5.2012
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
Shakuntla Goyal
State of Punjab
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
