Single judge dismissed the bail petition of an accused charged with offences under Sections 363, 366-A, 368 and 376 IPC, holding that offence under 376 IPC renders the case unfit for bail release.
Bail was denied; petitioner not released.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-10608 of 2012 (O&M)
Sonu @ Shanky
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of U.T., Chandigarh
....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Ajay Singh Parmar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr.J.S.Toor, Asstt. Public Prosecutor, for the respondent(s)-U.T., Chandigarh.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The petitioner is of accused for offences under Sections
363, 366-A, 368 and 376 IPC.
Counsel for the respondent-U.T., Chandigarh states that
the girl is minor.
Since the petitioner is accused for offence under Section
376 IPC, therefore, it is not a fit case to release him on bail.
Dismissed.
May 11, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) mamta JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner accused under Section 376 IPC should be released on bail.
Whether the case is a fit case for bail considering the minor status of the victim.
Sonu @ Shanky
State of U.T., Chandigarh
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
