Petitions challenging the grant of exemption to undergo Lower School Course were disposed of as infructuous upon respondent counsel's submission that the claim was already granted to the petitioners.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.11880 of 2011 Date of decision: May 14,2012
E.H.C.Chaman Singh and another
........................petitioners
V.
State of Haryana and others
..............................respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present: Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,J.(ORAL).
Learned Counsel for the respondents on the basis of the written instructions submits that the claim as made by the petitioners in the present case to dupute them to undergo to Lower School Course has been granted and,therefore, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In the light of the statement made by the Counsel for the respondent , the present writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
14.5.2012 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) sks JUDGE
E.H.C. Chaman Singh and another
State of Haryana and others
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
