This was a single-line order in a writ petition where the High Court disposed of the matter by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and decide it expeditiously.
Directing respondents to consider representation and decide it expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.10090 of 2012
Date of decision : 24.5.2012
M/s United Cooperative Labour and Construction Society Limited
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr.Gursharan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be satisfied if the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide his representation (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation (Annexure P-3) and decide the same, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.
24.5.2012 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
dss
M/s United Cooperative Labour and Construction Society Limited
State of Punjab
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
