A criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Rajesh Yadav and others was disposed of as infructuous because the trial court had already acquitted the accused persons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-6419 of 2010 Date of decision:-19.07.2012
Rajesh Yadav and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present:Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Shekhar Moudgil, DAG Haryana.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the
present petition has been rendered infructuous since the trial court has acquitted the accused persons.
Disposed of as having become infructuous.
July 19, 2012 ( NARESH KUMAR SANGHI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Rajesh Yadav and others
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Vijay Asija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
