Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty for alternate remedies. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn granting liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to alternate remedies available under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-31262 of 2009 Date of decision:-19.07.2012
Jia Lal Bansal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present:Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Harsimrat Rai, DAG Punjab.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of
the petition with liberty to take recourse to the alternate remedies available to him under law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
July 19, 2012 ( NARESH KUMAR SANGHI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Jia Lal Bansal
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
