Petitioner withdrew the petition to seek alternative remedy. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy, noting sympathetic consideration for delay condonation.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A No. 602-MA of 2012 Date of decision : 27.09.2012
R. Nanda
...Petitioner
Versus
Tilak Raj Sharma
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to avail her appropriate (alternative) remedy under the law.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
Needless to mention that if the petitioner moves an application for condonation of delay, then the same will be considered by the concerned Court
sympathetically.
September 27, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
R. Nanda
Tilak Raj Sharma
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
