The petition was dismissed as withdrawn to enable the petitioners to pursue an alternative remedy under the law, with liberty to pray for it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A No. 662-MA of 2007 Date of decision : 26.09.2012
M/s Medical India and another
...Petitioners
Versus
M/s Nav Rattan Traders and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. K.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to avail their appropriate (alternative) remedy under the law.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
Needless to mention that if the petitioners move an application for condonation of delay, then the same will be considered by the concerned Court
sympathetically.
September 26, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
M/s Medical India and another
M/s Nav Rattan Traders and another
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
