A petition for quashing of FIR was dismissed as infructuous by the Punjab & Haryana High Court because the petitioners had already been acquitted by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-21122 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.09.2012
Harbans Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Nemo for the petitioners.
Mr. Tejinder Singh Salana, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.
Nemo for respondent No.2.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned State counsel has submitted, on the instructions from ASI Surinder Singh, that since the petitioners have already been acquitted in the present case by the trial Court, so, the instant petition for quashing the FIR (Annexure P-1) become infructuous.
In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed, as having
become infructuous.
September 26, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Harbans Singh
State of Punjab
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
