The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as withdrawn, subject to a directive for the trial court to decide an indicated application within one month.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; trial court directed to decide indicated application within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-22074 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.09.2012
Ranjeet Kaur and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. R.P.S. Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for the State.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant petition to enable the petitioner to pursue his (already filed) application dated 05.09.2011.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
However, the trial Court is directed to decide the indicated application and to pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, within a period of one month positively from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
September 27, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Ranjeet Kaur
State of Punjab
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
