The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel without objection from the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-3309 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.01.2012
Richu Goel
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Saqib Ali Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Goripuria, D.A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1.
Nemo for respondent No.2.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner intends to withdraw
the present petition. Learned State counsel did not raise any objection, in this relevant connection.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
January 25, 2012 naresh.k
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
Richu Goel
State of Haryana
another
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
